4.6 Article

Long-term follow-up after trans-catheter tricuspid valve-in-valve replacement with balloon-expandable aortic valves

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 235, 期 -, 页码 141-146

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.076

关键词

Tricuspid valve; Trans-catheter tricuspid valve replacement; Valve-in-valve; Structural heart interventions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Transcatheter tricuspid VIV replacement has been proposed as a feasible option for high-risk patients with previous tricuspid valve replacement that undergo valve degeneration causing refractory heart failure. However, little is known about the long-term outcome of patients treated with transcatheter tricuspid VIV. We evaluate the safety of transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve (VIV) replacement by using balloon-expandable aortic valve stents and the long-term follow-up. Methods and results: From January 2013 to March 2016, 4 patients underwent transcatheter tricuspid VIV in our center using balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien-XT and Sapien-3 valves. In all cases the procedure succeeded with significant improvement of the tricuspid valve area (from 0.98 +/- 0.29 cm(2) to 3.1 +/- 0.45 cm(2), p = 0.005), right atrial pressure (from 21 +/- 7.78 mmHg to 8.5 +/- 2.51 mmHg, p = 0.025) and mean trans-valvular gradient (from 11.5 +/- 4 mmHg to 3.32 +/- 1.28 mmHg, p = 0.02). Three out of 4 patients presented a follow up longer than 2.5 years. At median follow up of 32 months (range 9-47 months) all patients were alive and presented with NYHA class I-II. Only one patient, who presented impaired right ventricular function at baseline, experienced re-hospitalization during the follow-up time. Echocardiographic assessment at long-term disclosed a well-maintained hemodynamic performance with low transvalvular gradients and no significant valvular regurgitation in all cases. Conclusions: In our experience, trans-catheter tricuspid VIV demonstrated good long-term results in terms of valve performance and functional class improvement at 32 months from intervention. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据