4.7 Article

Transcriptional variations in the wider peritumoral tissue environment of pancreatic cancer

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 142, 期 5, 页码 1010-1021

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31087

关键词

pancreatic cancer; peritumoral tissue; transcript variations; survival; disease prognosis

类别

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01GS08117, 01GS08114, 01ZX1305C]
  2. Heidelberger Stiftung Chirurgie (EPZ-Pancobank)
  3. Cancer Research UK [16812] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Pancreatic Cancer UK [2013 RIF - Greenhalf] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcriptional profiling was performed on 452 RNA preparations isolated from various types of pancreatic tissue from tumour patients and healthy donors, with a particular focus on peritumoral samples. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) and cystic tumours were most different in these non-tumorous tissues surrounding them, whereas the actual tumours exhibited rather similar transcript patterns. The environment of cystic tumours was transcriptionally nearly identical to normal pancreas tissue. In contrast, the tissue around PDAC behaved a lot like the tumour, indicating some kind of field defect, while showing far less molecular resemblance to both chronic pancreatitis and healthy tissue. This suggests that the major pathogenic difference between cystic and ductal tumours may be due to their cellular environment rather than the few variations between the tumours. Lack of correlation between DNA methylation and transcript levels makes it unlikely that the observed field defect in the peritumoral tissue of PDAC is controlled to a large extent by such epigenetic regulation. Functionally, a strikingly large number of autophagy-related transcripts was changed in both PDAC and its peritumoral tissue, but not in other pancreatic tumours. A transcription signature of 15 autophagy-related genes was established that permits a prognosis of survival with high accuracy and indicates the role of autophagy in tumour biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据