4.7 Article

A new L-amino acid oxidase from Bothrops jararacussu snake venom: Isolation, partial characterization, and assessment of pro-apoptotic and antiprotozoal activities

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.025

关键词

Snake venom; Bothrops jararacussu; L-amino acid oxidase; Apoptosis; Antiprotozoal activity

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2011/23236-4, 2015/00740-0, 2015/25637-7]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [476932/2012-2]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [15/25637-7] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new L-amino acid oxidase (LAAO) from Bothrops jararacussu venom (BjussuLAAO-II) was isolated by using a three-step chromatographic procedure based on molecular exclusion, hydrophobicity, and affinity. BjussuLAAO-II is an acidic enzyme with pI = 3.9 and molecular mass = 60.36 kDa that represents 0.3% of the venom proteins and exhibits high enzymatic activity (4884.53 U/mg/mim). We determined part of the primary sequence of BjussuLAAO-II by identifying 96 amino acids, from which 34 compose the N-terminal of the enzyme (ADDRNPLEECFRETDYEEFLEIARNGLSDTDNPK). Multiple alignment of the partial BjussuLAAO-II sequence with LAAOs deposited in the NCBI database revealed high similarity (95-97%) with other LAAOs isolated from Bothrops snake venoms. BjussuLAAO-II exerted a strong antiprotozoal effect against Leishmania amazonensis (IC50 = 4.56 mu g/mL) and Trypanosoma cruzi (IC50 = 4.85 mu g/mL). This toxin also induced cytotoxicity (IC50 = 1.80 mu g/mL) and apoptosis in MCF7 cells (a human breast adenocarcinoma cell line) by activating the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways, but were not cytotoxic towards MCF10A cells (a non-tumorigenic human breast epithelial cell line). The results reported herein add important knowledge to the field of Toxinology, especially for the development of new therapeutic agents. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据