4.7 Article

Comparison in docetaxel-loaded nanoparticles based on three different carboxymethyl chitosans

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.195

关键词

Carboxymethyl chitosan; Nanoparticle; Anti-tumor

资金

  1. Shandong Provincial Science and Technology Major Project, China [2015ZDZX05003]
  2. Science and Technology Development Program of Shandong Province [2014GGH215006]
  3. commonweal item of State Oceanic Administration People's Republic of China [201405038-2]
  4. Scientific and Technological Innovation Project - Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology [2015ASKJ02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, three different carboxymethyl chitosans (CMCs), namely O-carboxymethyl chitosan (OC), N-carboxymethyl chitosan (NC) and N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan (NOC), were prepared as nano-carriers for an anti-tumor drug, docetaxel (DCT). Three CMCs were fabricated into drug-loading nanoparticles under different preparing conditions respectively. A series of characterization parameters were determined including drug loading capacity (DC), entrapment efficiency (EE), particle size distribution, zeta potential, and morphology, which were used to find the optimized preparing condition for three kinds of nanoparticles (NPs). Furthermore, the in vitro drug release profiles of all the three kinds of nanoparticles showed a sustained release behavior and the release rate of OC-NPs was the fastest. Moreover, compared with NC-NPs and NOC-NPs, OC-NPs exhibited more cellular accumulation in the human gastric carcinoma cells (SGC 7901) as quantitatively determined by the flow cytometry and also much stronger cytotoxicity against these cells. Accordingly, our results showed that drug-loaded nanoparticles formed by different CMCs have dissimilar physiochemical characteristics which subsequently influence their therapeutic effects. We suggest that OC-based nanoparticle is a more desirable anti-tumor drug delivery system than NC-NP and NOC-NP. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据