4.4 Article

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Commensal Bacteria from Human Milk

期刊

CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY
卷 72, 期 2, 页码 113-119

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00284-015-0925-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. St. Mary's Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management
  2. St. Mary's Hospital, Luodong [SMC104-I-01, SMHRH-102003, SMHRF-103001]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 103-2320-B-562 -001-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have focused on foodborne or commensal bacteria as vehicles of antibiotic resistance. However, the antibiotic resistance of milk bacteria from healthy donors is still vague in Taiwan. For this purpose, human milk samples were obtained from randomly recruited 19 healthy women between 3 and 360 days post-partum. Antibiotic susceptibility profile of bacteria from milk samples was determined. About 20 bacterial species were isolated from milk samples including Staphylococcus (6 species), Streptococcus (4 species), Enterococcus (2 species), Lactobacillus (1 species), and bacteria belonging to other genera (7 species). Some opportunistic or potentially pathogenic bacteria including Kluyvera ascorbata, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Actinomyces bovis, and Staphylococcus aureus were also isolated. Intriguingly, Staphylococcus isolates (22 strains) were resistant to 2-8 of 8 antibiotics, while Streptococcus isolates (3 strains) were resistant to 3-7 of 9 antibiotics, and members of the genus Enterococcus (5 strains) were resistant to 3-8 of 9 antibiotics. Notably, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, S. aureus, Streptococcus parasanguinis, Streptococcus pneumonia, and Enterococcus faecalis were resistant to vancomycin, which is considered as the last-resort antibiotic. Therefore, this study shows that most bacterial strains in human milk demonstrate mild to strong antibiotic resistance. Whether commensal bacteria in milk could serve as vehicles of antibiotic resistance should be further investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据