4.6 Article

Genes directly regulated by NF-κB in human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2017.05.031

关键词

NF-kappa B; HepG2; Target gene; ChIP-seq; RNA-seq

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571119]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been well-known that over activation of NF-kappa B has close relationship with hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the complete and exact underlying molecular pathways and mechanisms still remain not fully understood. By manipulating NF-kappa B activity with its recognized activator TNF alpha and using ChIP-seq and RNA-seq techniques, this study identified 699 NF-kappa B direct target genes (DTGs) in a widely used HCC cell line, HepG2, including 399 activated and 300 repressed genes. In these NF-kappa B DTGs, 216 genes (126 activated and 90 repressed genes) are among the current HCC gene signature. In comparison with NF-kappa B target genes identified in LPS-induced THP-1 and TNF alpha-induced HeLa cells, only limited numbers (24-46) of genes were shared by the two cell lines, indicating the HCC specificity of identified genes. Functional annotation revealed that NF-kappa B DTGs in HepG2 cell are mainly related with many typical NF-kappa B-related biological processes including immune system process, response to stress, response to stimulus, defense response, and cell death, and signaling pathways of MAPK,TNF, TGF-beta, Chemokine, NF-kappa B, and Toll-like receptor. Some NF-kappa B DTGs are also involved in Hepatitis C and B pathways. It was found that 82 NF-kappa B DTGs code secretory proteins, which include CCL2 and DIM that have already been used as HCC markers. Finally, the NF-kappa B DTGs were further confirmed by detecting the NF-kappa B binding and expression of 14 genes with ChIP-PCR and RT-PCR. This study thus provides a useful NF-kappa B DTG list for future studies of NF-kappa B-related molecular mechanisms and theranostic biomarkers of HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据