4.3 Article

The parents' perspective of the early diagnostic period of their child with hearing loss: information and support

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 S3-S14

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1301683

关键词

Paediatric; psycho-social/emotional; cochlear implant; hearing aids

资金

  1. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [R01DC008080]
  2. Commonwealth of Australia through the Office of Hearing Services
  3. HEARing CRC
  4. Cooperative Research Centres Program of the Australian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: This study aimed to explore the perspectives of caregivers regarding the information and support they received following diagnosis of their child's hearing loss. Design: A mixed methods explanatory sequential design was conducted. Study sample: A total of 445 caregivers of children completed a written survey, and five parents participated in qualitative in-depth interviews. Results: The most common sources of information for caregivers were discussion with an audiologist, written information, and discussion with a medical professional. Approximately 85% of caregivers reported they were satisfied with the personal/emotional support and information received from service providers. Additional comments from 91 caregivers indicated that 11% experienced a breakdown in information transfer with health professionals. Interviews conducted with five parents from three families revealed two themes which described the diagnostic period as a difficult and emotional experience for parents: (1) support and information provided during diagnosis: what happens first? and (2) accessing early intervention services following a diagnosis of hearing loss: navigating the maze. Conclusions: The findings of this study give insight into the perspectives of caregivers who have a child diagnosed with hearing loss. The importance of providing timely information and personal/emotional support to caregivers cannot be underestimated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据