4.7 Article

Intrinsic flame retardant phosphonate-based vitrimers as a recyclable alternative for commodity polymers in composite materials

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 11, 期 30, 页码 4933-4941

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0py00275e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG WU 750/8-1, SCHA 730/15-1]
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) through the NanoMatFutur award [DuroCycleFVK 03XP0001]
  3. Max Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recycling of crosslinked fiber-reinforced polymers is difficult. Moreover, as they are often based on flammable resins, additional additives are needed. So-called vitrimers open the possibility of recycling and reprocessing and repairing with dynamically crosslinked chemistries. To date, vitrimer-based composites still need flame retardant additives, such as organophosphates. An additive-free vitrimer composite has not been reported. Herein, we synthesized an intrinsic flame-retardant vitrimer, relying on vinylogous polyurethanes containing covalently installed phosphonates as flame-retardant units and prepared glass-fiber-reinforced composites. We studied recycling and flame retardant properties and compared the data to phosphorus-free vitrimers and conventional epoxy resins (with and without additive flame retardant). Our phosphonate-based vitrimer proved in first tests, a flame retardant effect comparable to commercial flame retardant resins. The bending strength and bending modulus for the phosphorus-vitrimer glass fiber composites were comparable to glass fiber composites with permanently cross-linked epoxies. In summary, we were able to prove that the covalent installation of phosphonates into vitrimers allows the preparation of recyclable and intrinsic flame retardant composites that do not need flame retardant additives. We believe this concept can be expanded to other polymer networks and additives to generate recyclable and sustainable high-performance materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据