4.7 Article

A radiative transfer model-based method for the estimation of grassland aboveground biomass

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2016.10.002

关键词

Grassland aboveground biomass; Landsat 8 OLI product; Leaf area index; PROSAILH; Ill-posed inversion problem

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471293, 41671361]
  2. Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities [ZYGX2012Z005]
  3. National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2013AA12A302]
  4. China scholarship council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel method to derive grassland aboveground biomass (AGB) based on the PROSAILH (PROSPECT + SAILH) radiative transfer model (RTM). Two variables, leaf area index (LAI, m(2) m(-2), defined as a one-side leaf area per unit of horizontal ground area) and dry matter content (DMC, gcm(-2), defined as the dry matter per leaf area), were retrieved using PROSAILH and reflectance data from Landsat 8 OLI product. The result of LAI x DMC was regarded as the estimated grassland AGB according to their definitions. The well-known ill-posed inversion problem when inverting PROSAILH was alleviated using ecological criteria to constrain the simulation scenario and therefore the number of simulated spectra. A case study of the presented method was applied to a plateau grassland in China to estimate its AGB. The results were compared to those obtained using an exponential regression, a partial least squares regression (PLSR) and an artificial neural networks (ANN). The RTM-based method offered higher accuracy (R-2 = 0.64 and RMSE= 42.67 gm(-2)) than the exponential regression (R-2 = 0.48 and RMSE = 41.65 gm(-2)) and the ANN (R-2 =0.43 and RMSE= 46.26 gm(-2)). However, the proposed method offered similar performance than PLSR as presented better determination coefficient than PLSR (R-2 = 0.55) but higher RMSE (RMSE = 37.79 gm(-2)). Although it is still necessary to test these methodologies in other areas, the RTM-based method offers greater robustness and reproducibility to estimate grassland AGB at large scale without the need to collect field measurements and therefore is considered the most promising methodology. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据