期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 145-153出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2016.12.013
关键词
Forest biodiversity; Forest inventory; Forest monitoring; Structural complexity indicators; Airborne laser scanning; LiDAR
资金
- Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research
The conservation of biological diversity is recognized as a fundamental component of sustainable development, and forests contribute greatly to its preservation. Structural complexity increases the potential biological diversity of a forest by creating multiple niches that can host a wide variety of species. To facilitate greater understanding of the contributions of forest structure to forest biological diversity, we modeled relationships between 14 forest structure variables and airbdrne laser scanning (ALS) data for two Italian study areas representing two common Mediterranean forests, conifer plantations and coppice oaks subjected to irregular intervals of unplanned and non-standard silvicultural interventions. The objectives were twofold: (i) to compare model prediction accuracies when using two types of ALS metrics, echo-based metrics and canopy height model (CHM)-based metrics, and (ii) to construct inferences in the form of confidence intervals for large area structural complexity parameters. Our results showed that the effects of the two study areas on accuracies were greater than the effects of the two types of ALS metrics. In particular, accuracies were less for the more complex study area in terms of species composition and forest structure. However, accuracies achieved using thb echo -based metrics were only slightly greater than when using the CHM-based metrics, thus demonstrating that both options yield reliable and comparable resultS. Accuracies were greatest for dominant height (Hd) (R-2= 0.91; RMSE%= 8.2%) and mean height weighted by basal area (R-2 = 0.83; RMSE%= 10.5%) when using the echo -based metrics, 99th percentile of the echo height distribution And interquantile distance. For the forested area, the generalized regression (GREG) estimate of mean Hd Was similar to the simple random sampling (SRS) estimate, 15.5 m for GREG and 16.2 m SRS. Further, the GREG estimator With standard error of 0.10 m was considerable more precise than the SRS estimator With standard error of 0.69 m. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据