4.7 Article

Simulations of Early Kilonova Emission from Neutron Star Mergers

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 901, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abae61

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS Bilateral Joint Research Project
  2. JSPS [16H02183, 19H00694, 20H00158]
  3. MEXT [17H06363]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H00158, 19H00694, 16H02183, 17H06363] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present radiative transfer simulations for blue kilonovae hours after neutron star (NS) mergers by performing detailed opacity calculations for the first time. We calculate atomic structures and opacities of highly ionized elements (up to the 10th ionization) with atomic number Z = 20-56. We find that the bound-bound transitions of heavy elements are the dominant source of the opacities in the early phase (t < 1 day after the merger) and that the ions with a half-closed electron shell provide the highest contributions. The Planck mean opacity for lanthanide-free ejecta (with electron fraction of Y-e = 0.30-0.40) can only reach around kappa similar to 0.5-1 cm(2) g(-1) at t = 0.1 days, whereas that increases up to kappa similar to 5-10 cm(2) g(-1) at t = 1 day. The spherical ejecta model with an ejecta mass of M-ej = 0.05 M-circle dot gives the bolometric luminosity of similar to 2 x 10(42) erg s(-1) at t similar to 0.1 days. We confirm that the existing bolometric and multicolor data of GW170817 can be naturally explained by the purely radioactive model. The expected early UV signals reach 20.5 mag at t similar to 4.3 hr for sources even at 200 Mpc, which is detectable by the facilities such as Swift and the Ultraviolet Transient Astronomy Satellite (ULTRASAT). The early-phase luminosity is sensitive to the structure of the outer ejecta, as also pointed out by Kasen et al. Therefore, the early UV observations give strong constraints on the structure of the outer ejecta and the presence of a heating source besides r-process nuclei.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据