4.7 Article Data Paper

Earth transformed: detailed mapping of global human modification from 1990 to 2017

期刊

EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 1953-1972

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/essd-12-1953-2020

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data on the extent, patterns, and trends of human land use are critically important to support global and national priorities for conservation and sustainable development. To inform these issues, we created a series of detailed global datasets for 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2015 to evaluate temporal and spatial trends of land use modification of terrestrial lands (excluding Antarctica). We found that the expansion of and increase in human modification between 1990 and 2015 resulted in 1.6Mkm(2) of natural land lost. The percent change between 1990 and 2015 was 15.2% or 0.6% annually - about 178 km(2) daily or over 12 ha min(-1). Worrisomely, we found that the global rate of loss has increased over the past 25 years. The greatest loss of natural lands from 1990 to 2015 occurred in Oceania, Asia, and Europe, and the biomes with the greatest loss were mangroves, tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests, and tropical and subtropical dry broadleaf forests. We also created a contemporary (similar to 2017) estimate of human modification that included additional stressors and found that globally 14.6% or 18.5Mkm(2) (+/- 0.0013) of lands have been modified - an area greater than Russia. Our novel datasets are detailed (0.09 km(2) resolution), temporal (1990-2015), recent (similar to 2017), comprehensive (11 change stressors, 14 current), robust (using an established framework and incorporating classification errors and parameter uncertainty), and strongly validated. We believe these datasets support an improved understanding of the profound transformation wrought by human activities and provide foundational data on the amount, patterns, and rates of landscape change to inform planning and decision-making for environmental mitigation, protection, and restoration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据