4.3 Article

Inhibitory effects of 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine polymer on the adherence of bacteria causing upper respiratory tract infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/20002297.2020.1808425

关键词

2-Methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine; nontypeableHaemophilus influenza; streptococcuspneumonia; phosphorylcholine; inhibitory effect; detroit 562 cells; balb; c mice

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [25462689, 16K11239]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25462689, 16K11239] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective We aimed to investigate the inhibitory effect of 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) polymer on the adherence ofStreptococcus pneumoniae(Spn) and nontypeableHaemophilus influenzae(NTHi)in vitroandin vivo. Materials and Methods Phosphorylcholine (PC) expression of 21 strains each of Spn and NTHi was evaluated using fluorescence-activated cell sorting; the adherence of bacteria to Detroit 562 cells and to the nasal mucosa of BALB/c mice was determined. MPC polymer-mediated inhibitory effects were compared with PC-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (PC-KLH)-mediated inhibitory effects. Results In vitroexperiments showed that pretreatment with MPC polymer markedly inhibited the adherence of Spn and NTHi in a concentration dose-dependent manner independently of PC expression. No correlation was observed between PC expression and MPC polymer-mediated inhibitory effects. Contrarily, there was a significant negative correlation between PC-KLH-mediated inhibitory effects and PC expression in Spn and NTHi. The same results were obtained viain vivoexperiments. The MPC polymer did not affect the histology of the nasal mucosa. Conclusions MPC polymer might be effective to reduce the occurrence of upper respiratory tract infection caused by Spn and NTHi and could be applied for the development of local treatments, such as topical gargles and nebulizer medications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据