4.2 Article

The impact of health sector evolution plan on hospitalization and cesarean section rates in Iran: an interrupted time series analysis

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx169

关键词

health sector evolution plan; hospitalization rate; cesarean section; interrupted time series; Iran

资金

  1. research council of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences [96089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the effect of the health sector evolution plan (HSEP) on hospitalization and cesarean section (C-section) rates in Kermanshah province in the western region of Iran. Design: Interrupted time series analysis. Setting: Hospital care system in Kermanshah province. Study Participants: Fifteen hospitals affiliated to Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MoHME) in Kermanshah province. Intervention(s): Health sector evolution plan. Main Outcome Measures: Hospitalization rate and C-section rate. Results: We observed a statistically significant increase in the hospitalization rate (12.9 hospitalizations per 10 000 population, P < 0.001) in the first month after the implementation of the HSEP. Compared with the monthly trend in hospitalization rate before the intervention, we found a significant increase of 0.70 hospitalizations per 10 000 population (P < 0.001) in monthly trend in hospitalization rate after the HSEP. Although the proportion of C-section from total deliveries decreased by 11% (P = 0.044) in the first month after the implementation of the HSEP, the proportion of C-section from total deliveries increased at the rate of 0.0017% (P = 0.001) per month during post-intervention period. Conclusion: We found an increase in the hospitalization rate after the intervention of HSEP. Although the C-section rate in the first month after the HSEP decreased, we observed an increasing trend in C-section rate over the study period; this implies that the HSEP did not promote vaginal delivery in Iran, which is outlined as one of the objectives of the intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据