4.7 Article

Enhancing low-rank coal flotation using mixed collector of dodecane and oleic acid: Effect of droplet dispersion and its interaction with coal particle

期刊

FUEL
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118634

关键词

Low-rank coal; Collector; Dispersion; Flotation

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019XKQYMS62]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low-rank coal is difficult to float using oily collectors due to the rich oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface. In recent years, a variety of mixed collectors have been used to enhance the low-rank coal flotation. In this study, the effects of droplets dispersion and interaction with particles on the low-rank coal flotation using mixed collector (MC) of dodecane (D) and oleic acid (OA) were discussed. Interfacial tension experiment and Focused Beam Reflectance Measurement (FBRM) was used to analyze the oil droplets dispersion. The interaction energy estimation using EDLVO theory and the induction time measurement was performed to investigate the interaction between oil droplets and coal particles. The results showed that the addition of OA can significantly reduce the oil-water interfacial tension and shorten the time of interfacial tension equilibrium, which decreased droplets size and increased droplets counts. There was always attraction interaction between oil droplets and coal particles, and the absolute value of interaction energy and attraction force decreased in the order of D > MC > OA. The results of induction time measurement confirmed the interaction energy estimation using EDLVO theory. The flotation performance of the single reagent was greatly improved by mixed use, and OA and D showed synergistic effect. It was indicated that the effect of OA in mixed collector was to promote dispersion, that is, to reduce droplets size and increase droplets counts, rather than to improve interaction energy between oil droplets and coal particles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据