3.8 Article

Patterns of cancer care in Sri Lanka: Assessing care provision and unmet needs through an electronic database

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER POLICY
卷 25, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2020.100243

关键词

Electronic database; Cancer registry; Web application program interfaces; Event capture application; Patterns of cancer care; Delivery of cancer care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sri Lanka Cancer Registry (SLCR) maintained by the National Cancer Control Programme contains socio-demographic, histologic and some staging data on cancers. Currently there is no systematic process to gather outcome data of any cancer in Sri Lanka. The National Cancer Institute, Sri Lanka (NCISL) is the only dedicated cancer hospital in the country. This provides a unique opportunity to create an inception cohort that can be studied and followed up over an extended period. Our objective is to create an inception cohort of patients to study the patterns of cancer care at the NCISL. Detailed information on patient demographics, cancer diagnosis, treatment delivery, outcomes, comorbidities and health seeking behaviour are captured using an electronic database. This database was developed based on District Hospital Information System (DHIS 2) software platform. Approximately 4400 patients with breast cancer and 1200 patients with colorectal cancer have been collected both prospectively (February 1st 2018 to date) and retrospectively (January 1 st, 2016 to January 31 st, 2018) with ongoing prospective follow-up for all patients at 6-month intervals. Future of the data repository include coverage of cancers beyond breast and colorectal, expansion to include data from other public cancer treatment centres and linkage to the SLCR. This cancer care registry has the potential to form the cornerstone of cancer plans in Sri Lanka and to inform delivery of care and health policy decision-making enriching the SLCR. This registry is a crucial first step to build capacity in health systems research in Sri Lanka.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据