4.6 Article

Memetic Algorithm With Local Neighborhood Search for Bottleneck Supplier Identification in Supply Networks

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 148827-148840

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3016050

关键词

Automobiles; Complex networks; Production; Robustness; Loss measurement; Memetics; Supply network disruption; complex network theory; bottleneck supplier identification; memetic algorithm

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation Committee (NSFC) of China [51875429, 51905397]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the development of lean manufacturing and economic globalization, supply networks increasingly become complex and large-scale, within which thousands of firms inter-depend with each other. Due to these increasing inter-dependencies, disruption of a quite few critical suppliers, namely bottleneck suppliers, can induce high loss to a supply network and even make the whole network dysfunction. Identification of bottleneck suppliers is significantly important for supply network risk management. Thus, in this article, a method based on a memetic algorithm with local neighborhood search (MALNS) is proposed to identify bottleneck suppliers in a two-stage supply network. Firstly, a model based on multipartite network is designed to describe the product supply-demand relations between multiple manufacturers and suppliers, which considers the different roles of manufacturer and supplier and differentiates the products that suppliers supply. To assess the loss caused by supplier disruptions, two performance metrics of supply networks, average product availability rate and manufacturer functioning rate, are presented. Then, a MALNS-based method is proposed to identify bottleneck suppliers, i.e., suppliers whose disruption will decrease both performance metrics most greatly. Finally, a case study based on a real automobile supply network is presented to validate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据