4.6 Review

Emission controls of mercury and other trace elements during coal combustion in China: a review

期刊

INTERNATIONAL GEOLOGY REVIEW
卷 60, 期 5-6, 页码 638-670

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00206814.2017.1362671

关键词

Mercury; trace elements; emission; control; coal combustion; China

类别

资金

  1. National Key Technologies RD Program [2016YFB0600604]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program (973) of China [2014CB238904]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51376074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trace elements (TEs) in coal result in substantial pollutant emissions and cause serious damage to the ecological environment and human health in China. The emission and control of TEs, especially mercury, during coal combustion are of significant concern, and extensive studies have been performed in China in recent years. This paper reviews the emission characteristics and control strategies of mercury and other TEs during coal combustion in China. The occurrence of TEs in Chinese coals, including the average content of TEs in Chinese coals, the distribution of TEs in Chinese coals from different coal-forming periods, coal ranks, and coal-bearing regions are summarized. The emission characteristics of five specific TEs (Hg, As, F, Se, and Cr) during coal combustion in China are reviewed in detail. Effects of the coal type, combustion temperature, and combustion mode on the partitioning behaviour and emission characteristics of TEs are discussed. The effects of existing air pollution control devices of coal-fired power plants in China on the speciation and emission of TEs are discussed comprehensively. Various sorbents, such as activated carbon, fly ash, calcium-based sorbents, metal oxides, and mineral sorbents, used for TE removal are also summarized. Moreover, the removal performance of different sorbents for capturing certain TEs is compared comprehensively. Finally, future work for TE emission control in China is proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据