4.7 Article

Release of NH3, HCN and NO during devolatilization and combustion of washed and torrefied biomass

期刊

FUEL
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118583

关键词

Torrefied biomass; Combustion; Nitrogen oxide; NOx precursors; NH3; HCN

资金

  1. EU [727616]
  2. Academy of Finland [321598]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [321598, 321598] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of two different biomass pre-treatment methods (torrefaction and combined treatment of washing and torrefaction) on the formation of NO and its precursors, NH3 and HCN, during combustion has been studied. Experiments were conducted in an electrically heated single particle reactor under well-controlled conditions in N-2 and O-2/N-2 at 850 degrees C. NO concentrations of the product gases were measured during devolatilization and char oxidation, and the total amounts of released NH3 and HCN were determined during devolatilization. The results show that the conversion of vol-N and char-N to NO changed due to the pre-treatments, influencing the NO emission factor (released NO/energy content) of the fuel. For torrefied straw, the NO emission factor was significantly higher than for raw straw. The change in NO formation can partly be explained by how the nitrogen contents change due to the pre-treatments: both for bark and straw, around 20% of the initial fuel-N was removed during the torrefaction; for straw, 50% of the initial fuel-N was removed during the combined torrefaction and washing. In addition, the changes in the NO formation can be explained by the release of NH3 and HCN during devolatilization. The HCN/NH3 ratio increased with increasing N content and decreasing H/N ratio due to the pre-treatments. The conversion of vol-N to NH3 increased with increasing Ca content and decreasing K content. In general, the devolatilization of the pre-treated biomass samples resulted in a higher conversion of vol-N to NH3 and HCN as compared to the raw biomasses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据