4.7 Article

Prediction of thermal and electrical behavior of silicon rod for a 48-rod Siemens reactor by direct current power

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.09.004

关键词

Heat transfer; Joule heating; Direct current; Emissivity; Siemens reactor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21566015]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M613281XB]
  3. Applied Basic Research Projects of Yunnan [2015FB126]
  4. Analysis and Testing Foundation of Kunming University of Science and Technology [2017T20162006]
  5. NSFC, China
  6. Kunming Yeyan New-Material Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, a Joule heating model by direct current (DC) has been developed for the rods arranged in a 48-rod Siemens reactor (SMS-48). The combined effect of heat dissipation (radiation, convection and reaction energy) and heat conduction produced by Joule effect has been examined by application of the developed model, taking into account variations of the rod radius and wall emissivity. The influence of the rod location, rod radius and wall emissivity on temperature profile and voltage-current curves during the electric heating process have been studied. Furthermore, the thermal and electrical behavior of silicon rod arranged in the SMS-48 and SMS-24 has been compared with each other. The dimensionless parameter (p) has also been introduced to investigate the effect of the number of rods and their arrangement on energy consumption. The interesting results show that the temperature profile of the rod arranged in the inner ring within SMS-48 is flatter than that in the SMS-24. The curve of current increases and becomes lower for the inner ring and keeps a linear relation for the outer ring in a manufacturing process. The required current and voltage increase when the wall emissivity increases. Enlarging the reactor capacity and meanwhile decreasing the dimensionless parameter (p) is an effective method to decrease energy consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据