4.7 Article

Entropy generation analysis of mixed convective flow in an inclined channel with cavity with Al2O3-water nanofluid in porous medium

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.10.009

关键词

Mixed convection; Channel with cavity; Entropy generation; Porous medium; Newton-multigrid; Finite element analysis

资金

  1. LiDOng team at the ITMC at TU Dortmund
  2. LiDOng cluster team
  3. FeatFlow team

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A numerical study has been carried out in the analysis of two dimensional, incompressible and steady mixed convective flow in an inclined channel with cavity. The cavity is filled with Al2O3-water nanofluid saturated with porous medium using the Darcy-Brinkman-Forchheimer model. The temperature at the left wall of the cavity is considered as T-H and the inlet temperature of the channel is T-c while the rest of the walls are thermally insulated. The governing equations are discretized in space using finite element pair Q(2)/P-1(disc) which leads to the third and second order accuracy in the L-2-norm for velocity/temperature and pressure, respectively. The discrete system of nonlinear equations is treated by using Newton's method and the associated linear systems are computed using monolithic geometric multigrid solver with Vanka-type smoother. The effects of some physical parameters in the specific ranges such as Richardson number (0.01-20), Reynolds number (10-200), Darcy number (10(-6)-10(-3)), inclination angle (0 degrees-360 degrees), porosity (0.2-0.8) and solid volume fraction (0-0.04) on the flow are presented. The obtained results are shown in the form of isotherms, streamlines and some other useful plots. It is found that an increase in the inclination angle up to gamma = 135 degrees, maximum temperature gradient occurs and the temperature distribution is enhanced in the cavity that results an increase in the heat transfer. For an inclination angle greater than or less than this value, less heat transfer is observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据