4.6 Article

Immobilization of of diesel-degrading consortia for bioremediation of diesel-contaminated groundwater and seawater

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.07.001

关键词

Bioremediation; Polyurethane-polyurea; Alginate; C:N:P ratio

资金

  1. Ministry of Education of Taiwan
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [NSC 102-2221-E-006-007-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the potential application of immobilized diesel-degrading consortia for diesel removal in aqueous environments. The microorganisms were entrapped using polyurethane-polyurea co-polymers, alginate, and activate carbon, and total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) degradability were evaluated under freshwater and seawater conditions with diesel oil. The results indicated that immobilized cells remained active after entrapment, but rapid diesel degradation occurred after sufficient suspended cells growth in aqueous medium, suggesting that entrapped cells continuously released freely suspended cells and suspended cells degraded diesel as well. Under phosphorous-sufficient conditions (P/TPH > 35%), TPH degradation efficiency was achieved at 80% even at low nitrogen condition (NI TPH < 10%). Under phosphorous-insufficient conditions (P/TPH < 10%), the better degradation efficiency was obtained only at high nitrogen content (TPH:N > 100:7). The stoichiometric relationship for diesel degradation, nitrogen consumption, phosphorous consumption, biomass production was obtained (100:5:0.9:35). The results of repeated batch indicated that immobilized cells could be repeatedly used for diesel degradation in simulated groundwater and seawater environments for more than 360 days of operation. With a combination of copolymer, alginate, and activate carbon, the entrapped matrix presented advantages on high surface area, high porosity, and high mechanical strength for a long-term operation for diesel bioremediation in aqueous environments. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据