4.3 Article

Effect of room temperature on tests for diagnosing vibration-induced white finger: finger rewarming times and finger systolic blood pressures

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-017-1214-2

关键词

Vibration-induced white finger; Finger skin temperature; Hand-arm vibration syndrome; Hand-transmitted vibration; Finger systolic blood pressure; Cold provocation test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of room temperature on two standard tests used to assist the diagnosis of vibration-induced white finger (VWF): finger rewarming times and finger systolic blood pressures. Twelve healthy males and twelve healthy females participated in four sessions to obtain either finger skin temperatures (FSTs) during cooling and rewarming of the hand or finger systolic blood pressures (FSBPs) after local cooling of the fingers to 15 and 10 A degrees C. The measures were obtained with the room temperature at either 20 or 28 A degrees C. There were lower baseline finger skin temperatures, longer finger rewarming times, and lower finger systolic blood pressures with the room temperature at 20 than 28 A degrees C. However, percentage reductions in FSBP at 15 and 10 A degrees C relative to 30 A degrees C (i.e. %FSBP) did not differ between the two room temperatures. Females had lower baseline FSTs, longer rewarming times, and lower FSBPs than males, but %FSBPs were similar in males and females. Finger rewarming times after cold provocation are heavily influenced by room temperature and gender. For evaluating peripheral circulatory function using finger rewarming times, the room temperature must be strictly controlled, and a different diagnostic criterion is required for females. The calculation of percentage changes in finger systolic blood pressure at 15 and 10 A degrees C relative to 30 A degrees C reduces effects of both room temperature and gender, and the test may be used in conditions where the +/- 1 A degrees C tolerance on room temperature required by the current standard cannot be achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据