4.3 Article

CL-CPA: A hybrid carry-lookahead/carry-propagate adder for low-power or high-performance operation mode

期刊

INTEGRATION-THE VLSI JOURNAL
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 62-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vlsi.2016.11.009

关键词

Carry lookahead adder; Carry propagate adder; Hybrid adder; High performance; Low power; Voltage scaling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we present a double-operating-mode adder which may be employed either in low-power (LP) or high-performance (HP) operating mode. The adder has a hybrid structure based on a carry-lookahead and carry-propagate structures and hence is called CL-CPA. The selection between the two operating modes is performed through a mode selection bit during the operational period. The hybrid structure of the adder provides the feature of selecting the operating mode depending on the application deadlines and system available energy resources. The adder structure is realized by modifying the carry look-ahead tree (CLT) structure and then combining it with a carry propagate adder (CPA). During the LP mode, only the CPA structure is utilized while the CLT is deactivated through the power gating scheme. On the other hand, during the HP mode, the CLT structure is activated and the adder performs with its highest speed and power consumption using both CLT and CPA structures. The efficacy of the proposed hybrid adder is assessed by comparing its speed, power, energy, and area parameters with those of the other conventional adders obtained using HSPICE simulations for a 45-nm CMOS technology in a wide range of supply voltages. The results revel switching from the LP to HP operating mode leads to about 5.4X decrease, 2.5X increase, and 2.1X decrease in the delay, power, and energy of the 64-bit CL-CPA, respectively, averaged over the supply voltages. Also, the proposed hybrid adder provides flexibility on speed and power with an acceptable area usage for applications where both high speed and low power adders are required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据