4.5 Article

A comparative study of undoped, boron-doped, and boron/fluorine dual-doped carbon nanoparticles obtained via solution plasma as catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction

期刊

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS
卷 4, 期 9, 页码 4570-4580

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0se00708k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) under the Program on Open Innovation Platform with Enterprises, Research Institute and Academia (OPERA) [19H02482, 18072116]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. JST, Strategic International Collaborative Research Program (SICORP), Japan [JPMJSC18H1]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H02482] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Boron/fluorine dual-doped carbons, which have never been reported for their oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity, were successfully synthesized through a one-step solution plasma (SP) process using mixtures of toluene, as a carbon source, and heterocyclic compounds containing boron and fluorine atoms,i.e., 2,4,6-tris(4-fluorophenyl)boroxin, 2,4,6-tris(3,4-difluorophenyl)boroxin and 2,4,6-tris(3,4,5-trifluorophenyl) boroxin. Therefore, in this study, the obtained undoped, boron-doped, and boron/fluorine dual-doped carbons, synthesized using SP, were investigated and compared to find their catalytic activity toward the ORR. The FE-SEM observation showed that the obtained carbons had a diameter in the nanoscale range. XRD and Raman measurements revealed that the synthesisviaSP led to the generation of turbostratic carbons with structural defect sites. The carbon atoms were found to mainly interact with fluorine atoms through semi-ionic C-F bonding. All SP-synthesized carbon nanoparticles showed acceptable ORR activity in alkaline solution. However, boron/fluorine dual-doped carbon nanoparticles also drove the ORR through a two-electron pathway with low generation of the unstable peroxide, HO2-, compared to undoped and boron-doped carbon nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据