4.5 Article

Spectroscopic, electrochemical and DNA binding studies of some monomeric copper(II) complexes containing N2S(thiolate)Cu core and N4S(disulfide)Cu core

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 456, 期 -, 页码 179-198

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2016.10.045

关键词

Cu(II) complex; EPR and electronic spectra; Cyclic voltammetry; DNA binding; Cytotoxicity

资金

  1. DST, Govt. of India [SR/S1/IC-53 /2012]
  2. INSA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the synthesis, characterization and spectroscopic results of the Cu(II) complexes [Cu(pabt) (OH2)](ClO4) (1), [Cu(pabt)(Imz)](ClO4) (2), [Cu(Pabt)(N-Melmz)](ClO4) (3), [Cu(pabt)Cl] (4), [Cu(pma) Cl] (5), [Cu(pdta)Cl]Cl (6) and [Cu(reduced-pdta)Cl]Cl (7), (Hpabt = N-(2-mercaptophenyl)-2'-pyridyl-methylenimine, Hpma = N-(2-pyridylmethyl)-2-mercaptoaniline, pdta = 2,2'-di(pyridyl-2-methyleneimine)diphenyl disulfide, reduced-pdta = 2,2'-di(pyridyl-2-methylamine)diphenyl disulfide, Imz = imidazole, N-MeImz = N-methylimidazole). Electronic spectra of all these compounds display strong LMCT bands in the visible region mainly associated with S -> Cu(II), and consistent with TDDFT results. A four-line EPR pattern originating from the interaction of the unpaired electron with the central Cu-63/65 nucleus (I = 3/2, natural abundances: Cu-63, 69.17%; Cu-65, 30.83%) with the isotropic coupling constant (A(iso)) values of 80 +/- 1.5 G at RT for all these complexes suggests monomeric nature in solution. The redox behavior of these compounds show either nearly reversible or quasi-reversible Cu(II)/Cu(I) couple with redox potentials within the range -0.08 to -0.20 V versus Ag/AgCl. Some of these compounds show strong intercalative DNA binding and its complete cleavage. 1-3 exhibit remarkable cytotoxicity against C6 glioma cell line and human cervical cancer HeLa cell line. IC50 values of 2 and 3 for the cervical cancer HeLa cell line reveal that they exhibit higher cytotoxicity than many reported Cu(II) compounds. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据