4.5 Review

Molybdenum and tungsten-containing formate dehydrogenases: Aiming to inspire a catalyst for carbon dioxide utilization

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 455, 期 -, 页码 350-363

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2016.07.010

关键词

Carbon dioxide reduction; Formate dehydrogenase; Molybdenum; Tungsten; Biocatalyst; Greener energy forms

资金

  1. Unidade de Ciencias Biomoleculares Aplicadas-UCIBIO - national funds from FCT/MEC [UID/Multi/04378/2013]
  2. ERDF [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007728]
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, MEC [SFRH/BPD/111404/2015]
  4. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, MEC (FSE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The global energy demand and the present high dependence on fossil fuels have caused an unprecedented increase in the Earth's atmosphere carbon dioxide concentration. Its exponential and uncontrollable rise is responsible for large and unpredictable impacts on the world climate and for ocean acidification, thus, being a major concern for the ecosystems and human's daily life. On the other hand, the carbon dioxide abundance and low cost make it an interesting source for the production of chemical feedstocks and fuels. Yet, the thermodynamic and kinetic stability of the carbon dioxide molecule makes its utilization a laboratorial/industrially challenging task. In this Review, we propose to use the molybdenum and tungsten-containing formate dehydrogenase (FDH) enzymes as a model to understand the mechanistic strategies and key chemical features needed to reduce carbon dioxide to formate. We will highlight the present knowledge about the structure of FDHs, with particular emphasis on active site features, reaction mechanism and ability to reduce carbon dioxide to formate. The information gathered aims to inspire the development of new efficient (bio)catalysts for the atmospheric carbon dioxide utilization, to produce energy and chemical feedstocks, while reducing an important environmental pollutant. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据