4.7 Article

A study of welding process in connecting borosilicate glass by picosecond laser pulses based on response surface methodology

期刊

OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106427

关键词

Picosecond laser; Borosilicate glass; Response surface methodology; Process parameters optimization; Weld quality

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775252]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018 M630526]
  3. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province [GDZB-050, GDZB-075]
  4. Youth Key Teacher Training Project [2016016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Picosecond laser welding process was investigated on connecting borosilicate glass. A three-factor with five-level central composite rotatable design was utilized in the experimental study. The response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the key process parameters which determined the weld quality, which includes laser power, welding speed and repetition frequency. The micro-hardness, surface microscopic morphologies and weld width were also characterized respectively. Energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) line scans were performed to analyze the diffusion and migration of network formers elements during the laser welding process. The lap-shear strength of welded joints was determined by an electronic universal testing machine. The results indicated that the weld seam was continuous and uniform by using optimized process parameters with the lapshear strength ranging from 3.25 to 6.92 MPa and the weld width ranging from 250.9 to 430.8 mu m. The diffusion of Si and O elements occurred during the laser welding process, which was also one of the reasons for the improvement of the micro-hardness of the welded zone. The established mathematical model can precisely reflect the interactive influence of the picosecond laser welding process parameters on the lap-shear strength and weld width. Furthermore, the optimized prediction results were consistent with test results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据