4.7 Article

Coordination Polymers and Cage-Containing Frameworks in Uranyl Ion Complexes with rac- and (1R,2R)-trans-1,2-Cyclohexanedicarboxylates: Consequences of Chirality

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 56, 期 3, 页码 1455-1469

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02537

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Racemic and enantiopure (1R,2R) forms of trans-1,2-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid (H(2)chdc and R-H(2)chdc, respectively) have been used in the synthesis of a series of 13 uranyl ion complexes, all obtained under solvo-hydrothermal conditions and in the presence of additional metal cations and/or N-donor ligands. While the homometallic complex [UO2(R-chdc)] (1) was only obtained with the enantiopure ligand, complexes [UO2(chdc)(THF)] (2), [UO2(chdc)(DMF)] (3), and [UO2(chdc)(NMP)] (4), with a coordinated solvent molecule, were obtained from the racemic form only; all crystallize as two-dimensional (2D) assemblies. The two complexes [UO2(chdc)(bipy)](5) and [UO2(R-chdc)(bipy)] (6), where bipy is 2,2'-bipyridine, are isomorphous since 5 crystallizes as a racemic conglomerate; they are both one-dimensional (1D) homochiral, helical polymers. The heterometallic complexes [UO2Cu(chdc)2(bipy)(H2O)]center dot H2O (7) and [UO2Cu(R-chdc)(2)(bipy)]center dot 3H2O (8) crystallize as a 1D or a 2D species, respectively, while [UO2Cd(R-chdc)(2)(H2O)(2)]center dot H2O (9) displays a 2D arrangement with the unusual Cairo pentagonal tiling topology. The four complexes [(UO2)(2)Na-2(chdc)(3)(H2O)(2)] (10), [(UO2)(2)Ag-2(chdc)(3)(H2O)(2)] (11), [(UO2)(2)Na-2(R-chdc)(3)(H2O)(2)] (12), and [(UO2)2Pb(R-chdc)(3)(H2O)(4)] (13) are closely related, all of them containing tetranuclear, pseudotetrahedral [(UO2)4(chdc/R-chdc)6](4-) cage motifs, that are assembled into a three-dimensional (3D) framework by bridging counterions (Na+, Ag+, or Pb2+). These cages define a new pathway to assembly of such species based on the unique coordination geometry of uranyl ion, differing from the widely exploited use of octahedral metal ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据