4.0 Review

The association between serum omentin level and bodyweight: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 22-29

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.06.014

关键词

Omentin; Overweight; Obesity; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims: A number of studies have examined the association between omentin and body weight, but the findings have been inconclusive. Here in, we systematically reviewed available observational studies to elucidate the overall relationship between omentin and body weight, by comparison of serum omentin level in overweight/obese and normal weight subjects. Methods: PubMed, Science direct, Scopus and ISI web of science databases were searched for all available literature until January 2020 for studies assessing the association between omentin and body weight. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the quality of each study. Results: A total of 27 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. There was a significant association between omentin serum level and body weight (Standard Mean Difference (SMD)-0.43; 95% CI,-0.70 to-0.15; P = 0.002; I-2 = 93.2%). In order to find the probable source of heterogeneity subgroup analysis based on the participants' age (adolescent, adult), gender (male, female, both gender), health status (healthy, unhealthy), geographical location (Asian, non-Asian countries), study quality (low, medium, high), study design (case-control, crosssectional), participants' health status (healthy, unhealthy) and BMI (obese, overweight) was carried out. Conclusion: According to what was discussed, we found that serum omentin level is significantly lower in overweight subjects but not obese ones. This finding should be interpreted cautiously because of significant heterogeneity among included studies. (c) 2020 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据