4.7 Article

An efficient and simple approach for the controlled preparation of partially degraded konjac glucomannan

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106017

关键词

Konjac glucomannan; Polysaccharide; Heterogeneous hygrothermal degradation; Hydrolysate; Degradation kinetics

资金

  1. National Key RD Program [2016YFD0400804]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871844]
  3. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Innovative Group [2019CFA011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The degraded konjac glucomannan (KGM) has been reported to have health benefits and changes in rheological properties. In this study, partially degraded konjac glucomannan (PDKGM) with the weight-average molecular weight (M-w) in a range of 8 kDa-420 kDa was prepared by an efficient method named heterogeneous hygrothermal degradation. That is, solid state KGM powder containing a certain moisture content was placed in an autoclave and hygrothermal treated at 121 degrees C for a period of time; after removing from the autoclave and drying, dried PDKGM powder can be obtained. This method avoids hydrating KGM into sol for hydrolysis and then removing a large amount of water to obtain dried degraded KGM. The structure and properties of the PDKGM were characterized by SEC-MALLS, FT-IR, DSC, XRD, AFM and rheological test. The kinetic model of heterogeneous hygrothermal degradation was established to forecast the relationship between degradation conditions and M-w of KGM. Results indicated that this approach can obtain PDKGM with specified molecular weight and narrow molecular weight distribution through the control of processing time and initial moisture content of KGM powder. Meanwhile, it was also a facile method that can steeply reduce the apparent viscosity of KGM. Since no special equipment or complicated processes are required, we believe this is a realistic KGM degradation strategy with potential for use in industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据