4.7 Article

Hyperbaric cold storage versus conventional refrigeration for extending the shelf-life of hake loins

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2017.01.003

关键词

Hyperbaric storage; Cold storage; Fish preservation; Quality; Hake

资金

  1. State Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) through the CONSOLIDER-Network [MAT2015-71070-REDC, AGL2014-52825]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Today, extending the shelf-life of fish, while retaining the organoleptic properties of the product, is still a challenge. To compare the effectiveness of conventional and hyperbaric cold storage in preserving fish quality, we stored Cape hake loins at 5 degrees C, both at atmospheric pressure and at 50 MPa. After 7 days of storage, microbial counts and total volatile basic-nitrogen content in conventionally refrigerated samples exceeded the limits recommended for consumption. By contrast, hyperbaric cold storage maintained these parameters unaltered, although it produced drip losses close to 5% and increased the shear resistance and whiteness of the raw samples by 44% and 9%, respectively. Nevertheless, after cooking, weight losses were less than half of those of the control loins and whiteness differences disappeared. Consequently, the sensorial analysis could only find moderate differences between the samples before and after hyperbaric storage. These results clearly prove that hyperbaric cold storage was more efficient than conventional refrigeration for the preservation of hake loins. Industrial relevance: Hyperbaric cold storage opens interesting new doors for the fish-processing industry. Thus, it could be employed in different sections of the cold chain: on board, immediately after caught; at the food industry, during processing; on ship or trunk transport for long-distance markets; at school or hospital kitchens; at restaurants; or even at home. The increased cost resulting from hyperbaric storage should be overcome by an extended shelf life of a high-quality product. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据