4.7 Article

Anomalously low aftershock productivity of the 2019 Mw 8.0 energetic intermediate-depth faulting beneath Peru

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 549, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116528

关键词

intermediate-depth earthquakes; 2019 Peru earthquake; aftershock productivity; flat slab; stress heterogeneity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41874056]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Sun Yat-sen University [191gzd11]
  3. National Science Foundation [EAR1802364]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 26 May 2019 Peru (M-w 8.0) earthquake struck within the nearly-horizontal underthrust Nazca plate at depths from similar to 110 to 150 km below the upper Amazon, near a steep bend in the plate where it plunges down to a deep earthquake zone. Little prior seismicity occurred in this region, but large intraslab events with similar normal-faulting mechanisms have occurred to the west. The event is situated in a similar slab position to the 2017 Puebla-Morelos, Mexico earthquake, but the remote location resulted in limited loss of life and damage. Back-projection imaging and finite-fault inversion based on teleseismic data suggest a brittle and energetic rupture process with unilateral expansion northward over a 170-km-long zone at a rupture speed, V-r similar to 3 km/s, with three normal-faulting patches of up to similar to 4.5 m slip. Despite the mainshock size, it produced only three M4.0+ aftershocks within 300 km (one nearby); the aftershock productivity of the 2019 Peru earthquake is very low even among all large intermediate-depth earthquakes, but similar to that for other large Peruvian intraslab events. Comparison of aftershock productivity of the Peru event with that of global large earthquakes in various tectonic settings suggests that the low aftershock productivity can largely be attributed to regionally homogeneous faulting systems and relatively uniform stress state in the flat Peru slab. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据