4.6 Article

Maximizing pore and heteroatom utilization within N,P-co-doped polypyrrole-derived carbon nanotubes for high-performance supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 8, 期 34, 页码 17558-17567

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta06238c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [E2019204131]
  2. Talents Introduction Plan of Hebei Agricultural University [YJ201819]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Promoting the efficient utilization of both pores and heteroatoms remains a highly challenging endeavor, yet is of crucial significance to enhance the specific capacitance and energy density of carbon-based supercapacitors (SCs). Herein, a series of N,P-co-doped polypyrrole-derived carbon nanotubes (Px-ppyNTs) featuring a customized porous structure and doping level and intrinsically endowed with hollow cavities with tunable diameters were designed and synthesizedviaa strategic engineering approach. Benefiting from their regularly evolved physiochemical architecture, Px-ppyNTs served as a suitable platform to investigate the structure-property relationship between carbon-based materials and electrochemical capacitive behavior. Remarkably, the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) was proven to be critical to the reaction kinetics and resulted in the maximized utilization of both the porous structure and heteroatoms. The optimized ppyNT material with highest utilization of both the SSA (1853 m(2)g(-1)) and inherent heteroatom doping (nitrogen: 7.2 at% and phosphorous: 2.5 at%) exhibited an extremely high specific capacitance of 438 F g(-1)in 1.0 M H(2)SO(4)and energy density of 25.3 W h kg(-1)in 1.0 M Na2SO4. Furthermore, the calculated electric double layer capacitance (EDLC) contribution was maintained at as high as 203 F g(-1)even across a wide scan rate in the range of 5 to 500 mV s(-1). This work affords a promising electrode material for SCs and provides new insights into the critical role of ECSA in high-performance carbon-based SCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据