4.1 Article

Using Chromatin Accessibility to Delineate Therapeutic Subtypes in Pancreatic Cancer Patient-Derived Cell Lines

期刊

STAR PROTOCOLS
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100079

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [631701, A29996, 103721/Z/14/Z]
  2. American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Landon Foundation - INNOVATOR Award
  3. NIH
  4. NHMRC
  5. Cancer Australia
  6. Cancer Research UK
  7. Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award
  8. Pancreatic Cancer UK Future Research Leaders Fund
  9. Scottish Genome Partnership
  10. Pancreatic Cancer Research Fund [FLF2015_04_Glasgow, SEHHD-CSO 1175759/2158447, RBAP10AHJB, 12182]
  11. MRC/EPSRC Glasgow Molecular Pathology Node [602783, FIMP-CUP_J33G13000210001]
  12. Howat Foundation
  13. Italian Cancer Genome Project - Ministry of University (FIRB)
  14. Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro
  15. FP7 European Community Grant Cam-Pac
  16. Italian Ministry of Health
  17. ICGC Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
  18. [427601]
  19. [535903]
  20. [CA62924]
  21. [5R01CA150190-07]
  22. [P50 CA102701]
  23. [U01 CA224145]
  24. [1162860]
  25. [1162556]
  26. [1143699]
  27. [C29717/A17263]
  28. [C29717/A18484]
  29. [C596/A18076]
  30. [C596/A20921]
  31. [A23526]
  32. [A14276]
  33. [A25233]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Disrupted chromatin regulatory processes contribute to the development of can-cer, in particular pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The assay for transposase accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq) is typically used to study chromatin organization. Here, we present a revised ATAC-seq pro-tocol to study chromatin accessibility in adherent patient-derived cell lines. We provide details on how to calculate the library molarity using Agilent's Bioanalyzer and an analysis pipeline for peak calling and transcription factor mapping. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Brunton et al. (2020).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据