4.7 Article

Polyethylenimine-functionalized polyacrylonitrile anion exchange fiber as a novel adsorbent for rapid removal of nitrate from wastewater

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 258, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127373

关键词

Nitrate removal; Polyacrylonitrile fiber; Polyethyleneimine; Reusability; Wastewater treatment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of an adsorbent with high adsorption ability and favorable cyclic regeneration performance for the removal of nitrate residues from wastewater is a task of vital importance. To this end, polyacrylonitrile fiber (PANF) was modified with polyethyleneimine (PEI), and alkyl groups were then introduced around the active amine groups to prepare three polymer-based anion exchange fibers (PAN-PEI-3C, PAN-PEI-5C, and PAN-PEI-8C). The novel fibers were characterized using techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The adsorption isotherms of the fibers were best fitted by the Langmuir model, and PAN-PEI-5C exhibited a higher adsorption amount of nitrate (31.32 mg/g) than the other adsorbents. The equilibrium was reached expeditiously (within 10 min), and both pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models could well describe the adsorption kinetics. More attractively, the saturated PAN-PEI-5C could be eluted using a low-concentration (0.3 M) NaCl solution, without any sharp loss of adsorption amount for five consecutive cycles in the presence of dissolved organic matter (DOM). Furthermore, PAN-PEI-5C could effectively adsorb low-concentration nitrate from real secondary effluents in a fixed-bed column experiment. Our work provides a promising and low-cost material for the removal of nitrate residues in practical applications. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据