4.7 Article

Incorporation of lysine-modified UiO-66 for the construction of thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane with enhanced water flux and salt selectivity

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 493, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114661

关键词

UiO-66; Lysine; Post-synthetic modification; Thin-film nanocomposite membrane; Selective separation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778443]
  2. National Major Science and Technology Project of China [2017ZX0710100204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The utilization of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) has been proved to be promising in the attainment of high-performance membranes. In this work, lysine-decorated UiO-66 (Lys@UiO-66) is prepared via post-synthetic modification. Then, the controlled positioning of Lys@UiO-66 on a polyethersulfone (PES) substrate membrane is achieved by a pressure-assisted method, followed by interfacial polymerization to fabricate the Lys@UiO-66-based thin-film nanocomposite membrane (TFN-LDU). An even distribution of hydrophilic MOFs atop the substrate induces the formation of regular tent-like and mesh-topology polyamide structures, which enhance the effective membrane surface area and provide additional water transport channels. The optimal membrane with a Lys@UiO-66 loading density of 17.13 mu g cm(-2), TFN-LDU8, achieves a 55% enhancement in water permeability (18.27 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1)) without compromising the solute selectivity. Importantly, the TFN-LDU8 membrane exhibits high rejections of divalent cation salts (97.81% for MgCl2 and 92.81% for CaCl2) and improved mono-/divalent cation selectivity due to the pore hindrance and electrostatic exclusion of the Lys@UiO-66. Furthermore, the TFN-LDU8 membrane evinces a stable nanofiltration performance during the long-term nanofiltration experiment and displays a good antifouling ability in the fouling tests. This research provides a promising strategy for the design of nanofiltration membranes with special functions by using modified MOFs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据