4.0 Article

Leadership and administrative support for interprofessional collaboration in a cancer center

期刊

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2020-0007

关键词

Administration; Cancer care; Healthcare professionals; Interprofessional collaboration; Leadership; Quantitative methods

资金

  1. Finnish Work Environment Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The interprofessional collaboration is a key practice for providing cancer care. However, the realization of collaboration requires effective leadership and administrative support. In this study, the aim was to analyze healthcare professionals' perceptions of leadership and administrative support (strategic and management) in interprofessional collaboration for developing practices in cancer care. Design/methodology/approach A descriptive survey design was used to collect data from healthcare professionals (n = 350, response rate 33.3%), including nurses, physicians and other professionals participating in patient care in one Finnish cancer center (out of five) in 05/2018-10/2018. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The instrument focused on leadership in the work unit and administrative support including organization strategy and organizational management. Findings Healthcare professionals perceived leadership in the work unit, organization strategy and management for the support of interprofessional collaboration as weak. However, the ratings of male respondents and those in leading positions were more positive. The findings indicate that healthcare professionals in the cancer care setting are dissatisfied with the leadership and administrative support. Research limitations/implications Interprofessional collaboration, including its leadership, requires systematic and constant evaluation and development. Originality/value Healthcare leaders in the cancer care setting can use the results to identify factors that might be in need of attention and development in the field of interprofessional collaboration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据