4.6 Article

Knowledge Guided Capsule Attention Network for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASLP.2020.3017093

关键词

Sentiment analysis; Syntactics; Routing; Neural networks; Task analysis; Speech processing; Knowledge engineering; Aspect-based sentiment analysis; attention mechanism; capsule attention network

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1402500]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [61772155, 61802089, 61832004, 61832014, U1836107, 61972111, 61572158, 61602132]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aspect-based (aspect-level) sentiment analysis is an important task in fine-grained sentiment analysis, which aims to automatically infer the sentiment towards an aspect in its context. Previous studies have shown that utilizing the attention-based method can effectively improve the accuracy of the aspect-based sentiment analysis. Despite the outstanding progress, aspect-based sentiment analysis in the real-world remains several challenges. (1) The current attention-based method may cause a given aspect to incorrectly focus on syntactically unrelated words. (2) Conventional methods fail to identify the sentiment with the special sentence structure, such as double negatives. (3) Most of the studies leverage only one vector to represent context and target. However, utilizing one vector to represent the sentence is limited, as the natural languages are delicate and complex. In this paper, we propose a knowledge guided capsule network (KGCapsAN), which can address the above deficiencies. Our method is composed of two parts, a Bi-LSTM network and a capsule attention network. The capsule attention network implements the routing method by attention mechanism. Moreover, we utilize two prior knowledge to guide the capsule attention process, which are syntactical and n-gram structures. Extensive experiments are conducted on six datasets, and the results show that the proposed method yields the state-of-the-art.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据