4.7 Article

Exploring the growth-adjusted energy-emission efficiency of transportation industry in China

期刊

ENERGY ECONOMICS
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104873

关键词

Transportation industry; Energy-emission reduction; Metaglobal frontier DEA; Malmquist index

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [71774051]
  2. Changjiang Scholars Programof theMinistry of Education of China [Q2016154]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals [W02070325]
  4. Hunan Youth Talent Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

China's transportation industry has achieved significant progress but also proved one of China's primary energy -and carbon-intensive industries. Under this circumstance, it is necessary to assess the level of energy-saving and emission reduction (ESER) of China's transportation industry. Therefore, based on the panel data of China's 30 provinces during 2008-2017, this paper develops a new DEA model to evaluate the growth-adjusted energy-emission efficiency of transportation industry in China. The results show that, first of all, the growth-adjusted energy-emission efficiency of China's transportation industry is approximately 0.5543 during the sample period, and the provinces with high efficiency in their transportation industries are mainly concentrated in the central region and the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region; in particular, the central region takes the lead in low-carbon and energy-saving (LCES) technology of transportation industry. Second, during the sample period, the overall growth-adjusted energy-emission efficiency of China's transportation industry improves by 7.08% on average. The efficiency of the transportation industry in the eastern region improves the most, i.e., 28.99%. Finally, when evaluating the energy and/or environment-related efficiency of transportation industry, ignoring the trans-portation growth factors will underestimate the sustainability of transportation industry. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据