4.5 Article

Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Elderly Patient: Challenges and Opportunities

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 882-893

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001099

关键词

inflammatory bowel disease; Crohn's disease; ulcerative colitis; aging; elderly; review

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK043351] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The population of older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to grow, partly reflecting the aging global population in general. The debilitating effects of IBD compound age-related decrements in health and functional capacity, and make the medical management of older patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis distinctly challenging to clinicians. Here, we review the recent literature describing the pharmacologic management of IBD in this population, with focus on the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of common treatment options, such as steroids, immunomodulators, tumor necrosis factor-a antagonists, and integrin antagonists; surgical interventions in older patients are also discussed. Few studies have systematically and prospectively evaluated the clinical challenges in the medical management of IBD in this patient population, leaving a limited evidence base to which clinicians can turn to for guidance. Treatment patterns may thus be suboptimal. For example, prolonged steroid use in the elderly was found to be common, causing significant morbidity from side effects in a particularly vulnerable population. Finally, within the context of a limited evidence base, we discuss common treatment scenarios to define the parameters within which physicians can individualize care for older patients with IBD. Overall, older patients with IBD are at higher risk of adverse events and less treatment responsiveness compared with younger patients, underscoring the need for future studies to fully characterize appropriate treatment courses for this population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据