4.7 Article

Long-lasting direct capture of xylene from air using covalent-triazine frameworks through multiple C-H•••π weak interactions

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 400, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125888

关键词

Covalent-triazine frameworks; VOCs; Xylene; Breakthrough; C-H center dot center dot center dot pi

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC: 21506148, 5171101212]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City [16JCYBJC17000, 16ZXCLGX00120]
  3. Scientific Research Program of Tianjin Municipal Education Commission [2017KJ248]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Xylene molecules are a class of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the air that are harmful to human health. It is difficult to selectively capture xylenes from the air using existing porous sorbents, due to unspecific and insufficient sorbent/sorbate interactions. We herein report a series of covalent-triazine frameworks (CTFs) that enable selectively capturing of xylene compounds with high adsorption capacities at low pressure. The best-performing CTF material (CTF-2-400), which is comprised of biphenyl and triazine motifs, can adsorb a remarkable amount of o-xylene (358 mg g(-1)), m-xylene (392 mg g(-1)) and p-xylene (523 mg g(-1)) at 25 degrees C, outperforming most of emerging porous adsorbents. Its ability to capture low-concentration xylenes from the air has been demonstrated using a column breakthrough measurement. The column packed with CTF-2-400 (1 g) continuously captured xylene from the flowing air (similar to 1300 ppm; 10 mL min(-1)) for 192 h; by contrast, the commercial activated carbon lost its xylene capture capability after only 35 h under the same conditions. We find that the xylene adsorption capacities of the evaluated CTF adsorbents are unrelated to their pore widths or surface areas, and infer that the multiple C-H center dot center dot center dot pi interactions between the CTF framework and xylene molecules account for the observed excellent xylene capture performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据