4.7 Article

Fungal biosynthesis of lignin-modifying enzymes from pulp wash and Luffa cylindrica for azo dye RB5 biodecolorization using modeling by response surface methodology and artificial neural network

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 399, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123094

关键词

Reactive Black 5; Pleurotus sajor-caju; Immobilization; Genetic algorithm; Green enzymes

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES), a Brazilian foundation within the Ministry of Education (MEC) [001]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - Brasil (CNPq), a Brazilian foundation [421147/2016-4, 315405/2018-0]
  3. FAPITEC/SE (Foundation of Support to Research and Technological Innovation of the State of Sergipe) [88887.157371/2017-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the evaluation between the artificial neural network technique coupled to the genetic algorithm (ANN-GA) and the response surface methodology (RSM) for prediction of Reactive Black 5 (RB5) decolorization by crude enzyme from Pleurotus. sajor-caju. Fungal lignin-modifying enzymes (FLME) were synthesized using pulp wash (PW) as an inducing substrate, and L. cylindrica (L.C) for cell immobilization. When grown in PW, the fungus showed higher Lac activity (126.5 IU.mL(-1)), whereas when immobilized a higher MnP activity was achieved (22.79 IU.mL(-1)), but both methods were capable of decolorizing the dye in about 89.4 % and 75 %, respectively. This indicates applicability of PW as an alternative substrate for FLME induction and viability of immobilization for MnP synthesis. For RB5 decolorization, the action of the crude enzyme extract was considered as a function of pH, dye concentration, temperature, and reaction lime. The models are well adjusted to predict the efficiency of biodecolorization, with no statistical difference between ANN-GA and RSM, which indicates potential for green enzymes prospecting application in bioprocess industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据