4.7 Article

Size dependence in chord characteristics from simulated and observed continental shallow cumulus

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 20, 期 17, 页码 10211-10230

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-10211-2020

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Biological and Environmental Research [DE-SC0017999, DE-SC0019124]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0017999, DE-SC0019124] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study we compare long-term Doppler and Raman lidar observations against a full month of large eddy simulations of continental shallow cumulus clouds. The goal is to evaluate if the simulations can reproduce the mean observed vertical velocity and moisture structure of cumulus clouds and their associated subcloud circulations, as well as to establish if these properties depend on the size of the cloud. We propose methods to compare continuous chords of cloud detected from Doppler and Raman lidars with equivalent chords derived from 1D and 3D model output. While the individual chords are highly variable, composites of thousands of observed and millions of simulated chords contain a clear signal. We find that the simulations underestimate cloud size and fraction but successfully reproduce the observed structure of vertical velocity and moisture perturbations. There is a clear scaling of vertical velocity and moisture anomalies below the chords with chord size, but the moisture anomalies are only 1 %-2% higher than the horizontal mean values. The differences between the observations and simulations are smaller than the difference in sampling the modeled chords in time or space. The shape of the vertical velocity and moisture anomalies from cloud chords sampled spatially from 3D model snapshots is almost perfectly symmetric. In contrast, the chords sampled temporally from the lidar observations and 1D model output have a marked asymmetry, with stronger

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据