4.5 Article

Distinctively Expressed Cytokines by Three Different Inflammation Cells and Their Interaction with Keratinocytes in Wound Healing

期刊

INFLAMMATION
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 2151-2162

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10753-017-0655-9

关键词

wound healing; macrophages; neutrophils; cytokines; keratinocytes; GO/KEGG analysis

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31371404, 31571429]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [2015A030311041]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [GJHZ20150316160614842, JCY20160301150838144]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammatory cells exert crucial influence on wound healing, while exploration is still desired to get further insight into the key factors that promote the process. In the present study, we performed comparative microarray data analysis of the three types of inflammatory cells isolated from skin wounds and focused on differentially expressed secreted factors. Gene Ontology enrichment and receptor analysis indicated that 11 genes of secreted factors in Ly6C(+) inflammatory macrophages and 27 genes of secreted factors in neutrophils exhibited higher (ae 5-fold) expression, and all these factors were considered as candidates with potentially important role in keratinocyte activation. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis revealed that TNF and IL17 signaling pathways were activated by Ly6C(+) inflammatory macrophages secreted cytokines, while TGF-beta, HIF-1, NF-kappa B, and Rap 1 signaling pathways and pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells were highly involved with neutrophils secreted cytokines. Taking TNF as an example, the source of the cytokine and its impact on keratinocytes were verified by immunofluorescence, gene knockout mice, and quantitative phosphoproteomics. Collectively, this study has indicated distinctively expressed cytokines in three inflammatory cells, which is helpful in identifying key factors in inducing keratinocyte signaling and in wound healing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据