4.4 Article

Progenitor strain introduction of Mycobacterium bovis at the wildlife-livestock interface can lead to clonal expansion of the disease in a single ecosystem

期刊

INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 235-238

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.04.012

关键词

Kruger National park; Mycobacterium bovis; Whole genome sequence; Bovine tuberculosis

资金

  1. South African Medical Research Council
  2. National Research Foundation
  3. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia)
  4. South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology
  5. National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa [UID 86949]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mycobacterium bovis infects multiple wildlife species and domesticated cattle across South Africa, and negatively impacts on livestock trade and movement of wildlife for conservation purposes. M. bovis infection was first reported in the Kruger National Park (KNP) in South Africa during the 1990s, and has since spread to infect numerous animal host species throughout the park and across South Africa. Whole genome sequencing data of 17 M. bovis isolates were analyzed to investigate the genomic diversity among M. bovis isolates causing disease in different animal host species from various locations in South Africa. M. bovis strains analyzed in this study are geographic rather than host species-specific. The clonal expansion of M. bovis in the KNP highlights the effect of an introduction of a transmissible infectious disease leading to a rising epidemic in wildlife, and emphasizes the importance of disease control and movement restriction of species that serve as disease reservoirs. In conclusion, the point source introduction of a single M. bovis strain type in the KNP ecosystem lead to an M. bovis outbreak in this area that affects various host species and poses an infection risk in neighboring rural communities where HIV prevalence is high. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据