期刊
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101544
关键词
Social acceptance research; NIMBY; Normative approach; Criticism approach; Critical approach; Overview
资金
- Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT)
Social sciences have been very prolific in the last decades in publishing research that attempts to better understand the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies and associated infrastructures (RET) - such as high voltage power lines - and processes - such as communities' participation in related decision-making processes. This Perspective proposes that this might be a good point in time, roughly 30 years after social sciences begun looking at the social side of RET, to offer a (over)view on that research, if and how it has changed over time and where it leaves us currently or, in other words, which directions we should follow in the future. I first provide an overview of research on the social acceptance of RET, suggesting that it can be roughly organized around three waves - normative, criticism and critical -; for then identifying and discussing some avenues for future research.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据