4.6 Article

Aluminum and phosphorus codoped superaerophobic Co3O4 microspheres for highly efficient electrochemical water splitting and Zn-air batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 324-331

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.02.055

关键词

Trifunctional electrocatalysts; Co3O4; Overall water splitting; Zn-air batteries; Superaerophobic surface; Anion-cation double doping

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21421001, 21573115, 21875118]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [17JCYBJC17100, 19JCZDJC37700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multifunctional non-precious catalysts for hydrogen/oxygen evolution reaction (HER/OER) and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) constitute the bottleneck in the applications in electrochemical overall water splitting (OWS) and Zn-air batteries. Herein, a trifunctional electrocatalyst of urchin-like Al,P-codoped Co3O4 microspheres supported on Ni foam (denoted as AP-CONPs/NF) was fabricated via a hydrothermal process and subsequent low-temperature annealing and phosphorization, exhibiting enhanced OER, HER and ORR activities compared with single-doped and undoped samples. Their surface self-organized microstructure and excellent superaerophobic feature make a high bubble repellency, which boost diffusion of reactants and electrolyte-electrode intimate contact. The codoping of Al and P elements into Co3O4 betters right the balance among surface chemical state, the increased oxygen vacancies and the promoted charge transfer. Encouraged by these synergistic advantages, the AP-CONPs/NF was further employed as excellent bifunctional electrodes for the OWS (low cell voltage of 1.57 V at 10 mA cm(-2)) and as air cathode for rechargeable Zn-air batteries (high power density of 89.1 mW cm(-2)), which demonstrates a great feasibility for practical applications. (C) 2020 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据