4.7 Article

Extraction of total phenolic compounds from yellow poplar hydrolysate and evaluation of their antioxidant activities

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 574-581

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.12.062

关键词

Yellow poplar; Hydrolysate; Total phenolic compounds; Antioxidant activity

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2014R1A1A2055859]
  2. Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [20100020141]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A1A2055859] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Total phenolic compounds (TPC) from yellow poplar hydrolysate were extracted and their antioxidant activity was investigated. Of the different methods used for TPC extraction from the hydrolysate, solvent extraction was most effective having an efficiency of 84.84%. Based on adsorption and desorption of TPC on different materials, XAD resin showed high efficiency for adsorption and desorption in the range from 80.38 to 94.20% and from 75.14 to 82.10%, respectively. However, activated carbon was effective for adsorption of TPC, but the desorption efficiency was low, ranging from 0.55 to 331%, depending on the solvent. Among the resin types, XAD-16 was more effective in adsorption compared to XAD-4. All the extracts contained mainly sugar-and lignin-derived compounds, including xylose, acetic acid, and benzaldehyde. Antioxidant activity of the extract was determined using DPPH, ABTS, and reducing power. Solvent and pump XAD-16 resin extract showed excellent antioxidant activity comparable with that of the positive control. Strong significant correlations between TPC and antioxidant activities were observed at p-value of 0.001. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据