4.8 Article

Deep-learning-based prediction of late age-related macular degeneration progression

期刊

NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 141-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42256-020-0154-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [IIS 1852606, IIS 1837956]
  2. NEI Intramural Research Program [ZIAEY000546]
  3. UK Biobank Resource [43252]
  4. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [ZIAEY000546] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both genetic and environmental factors influence the etiology of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a leading cause of blindness. AMD severity is primarily measured by images of the fundus of the retina and recently developed machine learning methods can successfully predict AMD progression using image data. However, none of these methods have used both genetic and image data for predicting AMD progression. Here we used both genotypes and fundus images to predict whether an eye had progressed to late AMD with a modified deep convolutional neural network. In total, we used 31,262 fundus images and 52 AMD-associated genetic variants from 1,351 subjects from the Age-Related Eye Disease Study, which provided disease severity phenotypes and fundus images available at baseline and follow-up visits over a period of 12 years. Our results showed that fundus images coupled with genotypes could predict late AMD progression with an averaged area-under-the-curve value of 0.85 (95%confidence interval 0.83-0.86). The results using fundus images alone showed an averaged area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.81 (95%confidence interval 0.80-0.83). We implemented our model in a cloud-based application for individual risk assessment. Age-related macular degeneration is a serious eye disease which should be detected as early as possible. Using both fundus images and genetic information, a deep neural network is able to detect the severity of the disease and predict its progression seven years into the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据